Atheist and Freethinker Party
1. Fascism Rising
“This
is not a manifesto. This is an all-out war on conservative American society and
all it stands for. What have we become? I’ll tell you. Our country is becoming
more and more like the Third Reich every day. For example, for the 2012-2013
school year, thanks to a bill passed by Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal,
thousands of students across the state will receive vouchers to attend private
schools, some which teach from a Christian curriculum that teaches that the
Loch Ness Monster disproves evolution and states that the creature, which has
never been demonstrated to even exist, was tracked by a submarine. This
Accelerated Christian Education curriculum (ACE) also states that:
-Science
Proves Homosexuality is a Learned Behavior
-The
Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evolution
-No
Transitional Fossils Exist
-Humans
and Dinosaurs Co-Existed
-Evolution
Has Been Disproved
-A
Japanese Whaling Boat Found a Dinosaur
-Solar
Fusion is a Myth
-Only
ten percent of Africans can read or write, because Christian mission schools
have been shut down by communists.
-the
[Ku Klux] Klan in some areas of the country tried to be a means of reform, fighting
the decline in morality and using the symbol of the cross… In some communities
it achieved a certain respectability as it worked with politicians.”
-God
used the ‘Trail of Tears’ to bring many Indians to Christ.”
-It
“cannot be shown scientifically that that man-made pollutants will one day
drastically reduce the depth of the atmosphere’s ozone layer.”
-“God
has provided certain ‘checks and balances’ in creation to prevent many of the
global upsets that have been predicted by environmentalists.”
-The
Great Depression was exaggerated by propagandists, including John Steinbeck, to
advance a socialist agenda.
-Unions
have always been plagued by socialists and anarchists who use laborers to
destroy the free-enterprise system that hardworking Americans have created.”
-Bill
Clinton’s 1992 presidential win was due to an imaginary economic crisis created
by the media.
-“The
greatest struggle of all time, the Battle of Armageddon, will occur in the
Middle East when Christ returns to set up his kingdom on earth.”
-"Evolution
is the product of a global conspiracy by Muslims, homosexuals, communists,
Illuminati and Jews to undermine Christianity and destroy American national
pride and race. These sinners and sodomites are threats to our nation and must
be dealt with accordingly. "
-"Science
is an agent of Jews and socialists"
-
“the Spanish Inquisition was a noble organization with the goal of purifying
Europe.”
-
“Black people are agents of Satan that destroy our society with laws such as
“Affirmative Action.”
-
“Hitler was a hunter who hunted down and defeated his enemies.”
As
if giving young children lessons such as "The Jews are responsible for the
economic imbalance between the rich and the poor," once a student reaches
high school and college, they are continued to be taught hate. Places like
Liberty University, founded by the Christian extremist Jerry Falwell, teach
religion, but bastardize it into a weapon of insensitivity and sometimes
outright racism. For example, one passage from a textbook required for a
Liberty University course on the history of religion in politics, makes a
deeply disturbing implication:
"During
the rise of Fascism in the years leading up to WWII, many groups of people put
a considerable drain on the resources of countries like Germany and Italy.
Jewish people in particular demanded more out of the governments of the Weimar
Republic and the Kingdom of Italy than they could possibly give; what happened
to the Jews during the war was unfortunate, but the government of Germany had
no choice; in order to maintain its economy. A similar problem currently exists
in the U.S. We need a president that will have the same principles; a president
that gets things done regardless of ideology"
These
disturbing developments also pertain to Europe, as one article from a European
journal describes:
“Global
Internet censorship is here. SOPA and PIPA have been stopped (at least for now)
in the United States, but a treaty known as ACTA (the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade
Agreement) is far worse than either of them. ACTA was quietly signed by Barack
Obama back on October 1st, 2011 and most Americans have never even heard of it.
But it could mean the end of the Internet as we know it. This new treaty gives
foreign governments and copyright owners incredibly broad powers. If you are
alleged to have violated a copyright, your website can be shut down without a
trial and police may even show up at your door to take you to prison. It
doesn't even have to be someone in the United States that is accusing you. It
could just be a foreign government or a copyright owner halfway across the
world that alleges that you have violated a copyright. It doesn't matter. So
far, the U.S., the EU and seven other nations have signed on to ACTA, and the
number of participants is expected to continue to grow. The "powers that
be" are obsessed with getting Internet censorship one way or another. The
open and free Internet that you and I have been enjoying for all these years is
about to change, and not for the better. So how come the U.S. Senate never
voted on ACTA? Doesn't the U.S. Constitution mandate that all treaties must be
approved by a two-thirds vote in the Senate? Of course it does. But Barack
Obama has gotten around this by calling ACTA an "executive agreement",
which is a load of crap. Unfortunately, this is the kind of nonsense we are
getting out of Obama on a regular basis now. He has shown endless disdain for
the U.S. Constitution. Some members of Congress are expressing deep alarm over
ACTA. For example, U.S. Representative Darrell Issa is calling ACTA "more
dangerous than SOPA". There are some members of Congress that are even
demanding that ACTA be submitted to the U.S. Senate for a vote. Unfortunately,
their voices are very few so far, and ACTA is getting next to no coverage in
the mainstream media. But this new treaty is very, very serious. It basically
mandates that all Internet communications be constantly monitored for copyright
infringement. Sites like YouTube, Facebook and Twitter will have to monitor
accounts for copyright infringement 24 hours a day. If you are alleged to have
committed a violation, you might not just lose your social media account or
your website. You could potentially be sent to prison. Yes, seriously. What we
are talking about is Chinese-style Internet censorship for the entire globe.
The following comes from a recent Forbes article....
“Why
does ACTA matter to the media and citizens?” writes Alex Howard. “Consider the
phrase “intermediary liability.” That’s the principle that websites on the
Internet, like YouTube, Internet service providers, web hosting companies or
social networks, should not be held liable for the content created or uploaded
by their users.”
The
new rules proposed in ACTA essentially transform Western ISPs into something
more along the lines of ISPs in China and other more restrictive nations. One
of the worst elements of ACTA is that it would allow accusers of copyright
infringement to completely and totally bypass judicial review. If you don't
think that ACTA will change the Internet, just check out the following excerpt
from a recent article by Paul Joseph Watson....
“Under
the provisions of ACTA, copyright holders will be granted sweeping direct
powers to demand ISPs remove material from the Internet on a whim. Whereas ISPs
normally are only forced to remove content after a court order, all legal
oversight will be abolished, a precedent that will apply globally, rendering
the treaty worse in its potential scope for abuse than SOPA or PIPA.”
Big
sites like YouTube, Facebook and Twitter may just decide that it is too much of
a hassle to monitor millions of pieces of content. Allowing users to constantly
post content on their sites would be a huge risk. In fact, if they are found to
be allowing "copyright infringement", those sites could be
permanently shut down.
The
American people need to get educated about this new treaty before it is too
late. There is still a chance that we could get the U.S. Congress to take
action against this new treaty. Under ACTA, Internet service providers will
essentially be required to become the police of the Internet. This was
explained in a recent article by Cory Doctorow....
“New
revelations on ACTA, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), a
secretive global copyright being privately negotiated by rich countries away
from the UN: ACTA will require ISPs to police trademarks the way they currently
police copyright. That means that if someone accuses you of violating a
trademark with a web-page, blog-post, video, tweet, etc, your ISP will be
required to nuke your material without any further proof, or be found to be
responsible for any trademark violations along with you. And of course,
trademark violations are much harder to verify than copyright violations, since
they often hinge on complex, fact-intensive components like tarnishment,
dilution and genericization. Meaning that ISPs are that much more likely to
simply take all complaints at face-value, leading to even more easy censorship
of the Internet with nothing more than a trumped-up trademark claim.”
One
of the big problems with ACTA is that it is way too broad and way too vague.
Vague language allows authorities to "interpret" the law any way that
they see fit. This can often lead to selective enforcement. Websites that
authorities like will be left alone, while those that they don't like will be
harassed or completely shut down. ACTA was written in secret and it has been
pushed through very, very quietly. The following comes from a recent CNN
article....
“Like
many trade agreements, ACTA is a confusing mess. Even its signatories don't
agree on how it's supposed to work. The way it's been pushed forward has also
been unruly -- talks have been held in secret, without any kind of legislative
oversight or input from citizens or public-interest groups. The public only
became aware of it in 2008, a couple of years after discussions began, when
Wikileaks published a discussion paper. Since then, drafts of the pact have
been released to the public, each successively less onerous to critics. Reportedly,
though, big media and pharmaceutical lobbyists have been privy to the talks all
along”
Of
course - this is a chance for big media and big corporations to take control of
the Internet.
The
way ACTA has been pushed on us has been absolutely disgusting. In fact, one key
EU official that was in charge of investigating ACTA has resigned in protest
over how this whole thing has gone down. He says that ACTA is basically being
crammed down the throats of the European people...
I
want to denounce in the strongest possible manner the entire process that led
to the signature of this agreement: no inclusion of civil society
organisations, (sic) a lack of transparency from the start of the negotiations,
repeated postponing of the signature of the text without an explanation being
ever given, exclusion of the EU Parliament’s demands that were expressed on
several occasions in our assembly.
As
rapporteur of this text, I have faced never-before-seen manoeuvres (sic) from
the right wing of this Parliament to impose a rushed calendar before public
opinion could be alerted, thus depriving the Parliament of its right to
expression and of the tools at its disposal to convey citizens’ legitimate
demands.” Everyone knows the ACTA agreement is problematic, whether it is its
impact on civil liberties, the way it makes Internet access providers liable,
its consequences on generic drugs manufacturing, or how little protection it
gives to our geographical indications. This agreement might have major
consequences on citizens’ lives, and still, everything is being done to prevent
the European Parliament from having its say in this matter. That is why today,
as I release this report for which I was in charge, I want to send a strong
signal and alert the public opinion about this unacceptable situation. I will
not take part in this masquerade.”
Back
in our own country, we see totalitarian practices arising in those we hired to
serve and protect us, such as police forces. Here are some crimes committed by
our law enforcement agencies:
What
you are about to read is absolutely going to amaze you. The following are 20
really crazy things that school children (and even some in college) are being
arrested for in America....
#1
At one public school down in Texas, a 12-year-old girl named Sarah Bustamantes
was recently arrested for spraying herself with perfume.
#2
A 13-year-old student at a school in Albuquerque, New Mexico was recently
arrested by police for burping in class.
#3
Another student down in Albuquerque was forced to strip down to his underwear
while five adults watched because he had $200 in his pocket. The student was
never formally charged with doing anything wrong.
#4
A security guard at one school in California broke the arm of a 16-year-old
girl because she left some crumbs on the floor after cleaning up some cake that
she had spilled.
#5
One teenage couple down in Houston poured milk on each other during a squabble
while they were breaking up. Instead of being sent to see the principal, they
were arrested and sent to court.
#6
In early 2010, a 12-year-old girl at a school in Forest Hills, New York was
arrested by police and marched out of her school in handcuffs just because she
doodled on her desk. "I love my friends Abby and Faith" was what she
reportedly scribbled on her desk.
#7
A 6-year-old girl down in Florida was handcuffed and sent to a mental facility
after throwing temper tantrums at her elementary school.
#8
One student down in Texas was reportedly arrested by police for throwing paper
airplanes in class.
#9
A 17-year-old honor student in North Carolina named Ashley Smithwick
accidentally took her father's lunch with her to school. It contained a small
paring knife which he would use to slice up apples. So what happened to this
standout student when the school discovered this? The school suspended her for
the rest of the year and the police charged her with a misdemeanor.
#10
In Allentown, Pennsylvania a 14-year-old girl was tasered in the groin area by
a school security officer even though she had put up her hands in the air to
surrender.
#11
Down in Florida, an 11-year-old student was arrested, thrown in jail and
charged with a third-degree felony for bringing a plastic butter knife to school.
#12
Back in 2009, an 8-year-old boy in Massachusetts was sent home from school and
was forced to undergo a psychological evaluation because he drew a picture of
Jesus on the cross.
#13
A police officer in San Mateo, California blasted a 7-year-old special
education student in the face with pepper spray because he would not quit
climbing on the furniture.
#14
In America today, even 5-year-old children are treated brutally by police. The
following is from a recent article that described what happened to one very
young student in Stockton, California a while back....
“Earlier
this year, a Stockton student was handcuffed with zip ties on his hands and
feet, forced to go to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation and was charged
with battery on a police officer. That student was 5 years old.”
#15
At one school in Connecticut, a 17-year-old boy was thrown to the floor and
tasered five times because he was yelling at a cafeteria worker.
#16
A teenager in suburban Dallas was forced to take on a part-time job after being
ticketed for using foul language in one high school classroom. The original
ticket was for $340, but additional fees have raised the total bill to $637.
#17
A few months ago, police were called out when a little girl kissed a little boy
during a physical education class at an elementary school down in Florida.
#18
A 6-year-old boy was recently charged with sexual battery for some
"inappropriate touching" during a game of tag at one elementary
school in the San Francisco area.
#19
In Massachusetts, police were recently sent out to collect an overdue library
book from a 5-year-old girl.
#20
In California, a 22-year old young woman was ordered to strip down to her
underwear to prove that she wasn't carrying a weapon. The "weapon"
turned out to be a lipstick roll. She also reported that the five SWAT police
officers, all men, were making sexual advances on her. They also made
anti-Semitic remarks and called her "Auschwitz firewood," as she
stood there crying, only to Taser her 3 times on her bare stomach for talking
once during the "investigation." She later claimed that the police
had pulled her out of class violently and told the other students in the class
to "shut up and look away!" as she was essentially dragged off into
an empty, windowless office.
#21
Recent developments in the Republican Presidential elections for 2012 show that
the neo-conservative extreme right is resorting to very non-democratic
policies. In addition to passing the NDAA, or National Defense Authorization
Act, which allows military or SWAT police to arrest anyone for any crime, based
on only a simple accusation with no regard for habeas corpus or due process of
law in the name of "public interest," as well as "secret inqury
panels," and ACTA, which allows any country to essentially police and
censor any internet content that violates a copyright; (or any site the
government doesn't like its citizens seeing, protected or not) and send that
person to prison with no trial or lawyer or even judicial review of the case, "Big
Brother" in Congress is also using an independent support force, aka a
government stormtrooper corps. Yes, you read that right. Training facilities in
various military headquarters around the country are training elite
super-troopers, called Night Hammers, who vow to "protect America from its
sovereign enemies and any evildoers or agents of deviance, chaos or
anarchy." Their uniforms look very similar to the classic Mussolini
Blackshirts...this is real, people. A Fourth Reich may very well appear in the
same country that destroyed the Third, and all of our military spending
couldn't protect us from an attack in the least-expected direction...our own
government.”
Add
that information onto people like Joe Arpaio, a sheriff in Arizona whose
practices of racism, unfair treatment of prisoners and police brutality have
landed him in hot water with the federal government, the rise of Fascist
militia groups and the dramatic rise of hate crimes in our country, and it
appears that both Europe and America are at risk of falling into totalitarian
dictatorships. Indeed, numerous authors, such as Jorgen Randers, author of the
book “2052: A Global Forecast,” have suggested that it is almost a matter of
time until Americans and Europeans, fed up with slow economies, stagnant wages
and unemployment, become violent reactionaries, unless colossal reforms are
undertaken. This does not seem to be happening anytime soon, and if Randers is
right, the “Spirit of Nationalism,” which rose in the 1920s and died in 1945,
will appear once again by mid-to-late century, most likely in Europe, but a
Fascist America is possible. There are now more than 1,500 “revolutionary”
militias in America and more than 2,000 such organizations in Europe, according
to census estimates on both continents that believe Hitler didn’t do enough.
This book will describe the major problems that the West faces, and how they
can be stopped, before it’s too late. The point is that Fascism never truly
died with the Nazis’ defeat. The ideology is still there, and will almost
certainly erupt in the future; it’s only a question of when.
1. Religion: A Message of Hate
“Love
thy neighbor and thy enemy.” Isn’t this
exactly what Jesus taught his followers? Well, American Christians certainly
don’t think so. Televangelists such as Pat Robertson have blamed atheists, Jews
and homosexuals for such events as 9-11-01, the Columbine High School tragedy,
Hurricane Katrina and the Japanese 2011 Tsunami, as well as every single war
since the beginning of time. Organizations such as the Westboro Baptist Church,
who protests outside of soldiers’ funerals with messages of pure, naked racism,
anti-Semitism and extreme hatred towards homosexuals, are everywhere. The Tea
Party blames Muslims for all of America’s problems, and even compared President
Obama to Hitler and Stalin. Racial profiling amongst police forces is
dramatically increasing, much of this caused by faith-based bias, and upon
Obama’s 2008 election, Texas and Louisiana actually considered seceding from
the Union on grounds that Obama was the Anti-Christ. Militia groups, such as
the Hutaree Militia in Washington State, believe that they will be on the front
lines at the Battle of Armageddon, the final struggle between Jesus and the
Anti-Christ. Apparently, Christianity has become an agent of hate, fear,
oppression, flat-out propaganda and Fascism. In order to prevent religious
Fascism from overwhelming America and Europe, there needs to be a counterattack
just as ferocious, one that will rise to fight against the religious right,
using the same tactics that the religious right uses against its victims:
fear-mongering, protests, publications and even outright violence. This
“Extreme Left,” I will term the New Enlightenment Brotherhood for a New
Society, or just “The Brotherhood,” for short. The Brotherhood’s mission will
be to
-Counter
religious propaganda with quick, decisive blows that will serve to terrorize
Christians in their own country, the same way that Christians attack atheists,
Jews and Muslims.
-Force
society to change and accept people with unorthodox beliefs and behaviors as
equals through political and social “coercion.”
-Refuse
to accept society “the way it is” and change people’s minds by any means
necessary and at any cost.
-Ignore
all social boundaries, and simply do what YOU think is right, do NOT give a
damn about anyone else. You are the most important person on Earth, you and
your Brotherhood.
This
Brotherhood will force change upon society, it will operate as its own society,
going by its own laws and its own policies, disregarding all “exterior” laws
and rules. The Brotherhood will wear its uniforms, black robes, black capes and
huge red, peaked hoods, with power and pride. No matter how many of us are
arrested and placed in jail, the government cannot kill, destroy or stop an
idea from spreading. Once this Brotherhood Manifesto is published, the idea is
there, and that is something no government can destroy, even if they decided to
burn down half the houses in America or Europe! It is the Brotherhood’s sworn duty
to protect humanity from the forces of Christianity and conservative abuses.
Who knows? We might even inspire a future world leader to build a country
around these ideals. Raise high the banner!
So
what would constitute a New Enlightenment government? Well, such a government
would have:
-A
massive military machine
-Strict
atheism, enforced through terror
-Atheist
rallies in cities to unite nonbelievers
-Boycotts
of religious publications and churches
-Disregard
for “backwards” guidelines such as the Ten Commandments, and focusing on human
reason.
-Drastically
increased federal spending on technology, health care and scientific projects
for governments
-Less
emphasis on family values and more on education in science, math and history.
-Doing
away with family with the entire family’s consent without divorce proceedings,
and full allowance of same-sex marriage, abortion and stem-cell research, with
no acknowledgement of religious objections at all. (The first point allowing
progress to continue for all members of the family if the family can’t get
along; say, domestic violence)
-Controlling
pushback from religious interest groups and PACs by any means necessary.
- An economic system in which men and women are
equals in the workplace, and that the government has the right to seize the
business and force reform if the employers don’t comply with these laws, as
long as the workers are all loyal to the atheist parties in power.
-Equal
pay for all peoples that are members of the ruling atheist parties.
-Creating
a “city on the hill,” or a model for all other societies to follow; this would
depend on the nature of the individual society, if one nation valued medical
research above all else, pharmacists, doctors, nurses and surgeons would be the
most revered and prestigious members of society; and other philosophies would
also follow the same model. The political preferences of Atheist Supremacy, a
critical pillar in this ideal, would vary from country to country. Some nations
might revere physical beauty and intellectual prowess over all others, the
limitless possibilities will stun the world. Most of all, any nation that
embraced this ideal would inevitably become more powerful that the U.S.A., as
what we have already seen in China could happen in any New Enlightenment
country. This message will hopefully get across to the world, and the Christian
masses must prepare for vicious retaliation. Atheist pride, worldwide!!
1. Military Supremacy
A
nation is but a paper entity without an effective military, especially if the
country is rich. Without military protection, a prosperous state is defenseless
against an easy land grab. We saw this in 1939 with the German invasion of
Poland, with the Panzer divisions running roughshod over the ill-equipped
Polish army; Poland fell within 4 weeks. The same thing happened with the
German Great Sleigh Drive, with the German forces roaring into Memel on
thousands of one-horse open sleighs, crushing the Swedish forces in the Duchy
of Prussia and driving them out of Germany. The reverse is also true, in the
fact that Poland and Finland were able to defeat the USSR because of the
incompetence of the Soviet generals. For an Empire to survive, it needs a
military and an extraordinarily powerful one if it wants to be a global power.
Any New Enlightenment society would have to fit this category, which means that
the country in question would have to have a population of 80-110 million
people or larger, similar in size to Russia, Germany or France; each of these
countries have noble and valiant histories of warfare and military lore,
between Napoleon, Hitler and the Great Russian despots, such as Peter the
Great, Joseph Stalin and Ivan the Terrible. Assuming that at some time in the
future, one of these countries becomes a New Enlightenment ideal, the country
would begin building an army right away. France and Russia already have a huge
army, but Germany has only a small defense force. Under a New Enlightenment
government, however, the military would be on a scale not seen since the Second
World War. France, Germany and Russia, could, based on what Napoleon, Hitler
and Stalin did, muster 12 million, 18 million and a whopping 33 million troops,
respectively, throughout the course of any war. The massive industrial
complexes of these three countries would churn out thousands of military
vehicles per day, allowing them to crush any other European country that they
might face; France and Russia would be even more powerful, thanks to their
nuclear weapons. If the New Enlightenment country could gain allies with other,
likeminded countries, so the better. With the current European crisis, which
will continue until the European Union collapses, the rise of an authoritarian,
militaristic government in Europe is definitely not out of the question. If the
New Enlightenment or anything close to it arises in one or more countries, the
European Union would be history. Right now, the largest European Union
economies are Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Spain and Italy, and all
five are in economic chaos; only Germany has an AAA credit rating anymore.
These 5 economies are the centerpieces of Europe, and Spain, Italy and even
France are in danger of credit downgrades and even default. Given the nature of
the New Enlightenment, only Britain, Germany and France, already mostly
atheist, would be willing to accept the system. Britain has already been called
a “post-religious” society, as have France and Germany. If the European Union
collapsed in the most extreme scenario imaginable, a unilateral withdrawal and
dissolution by Germany, then an authoritarian government would become a
certainty. Germany would go rogue, as would its ally, France, and if the
circumstances were just right, extreme nationalism would mutate into Fascism.
Germany would likely annex Austria again, assuming the Austrian leader would
agree to it, France would try to annex Belgium, and Britain would probably seek
protection by the United States, as would Poland, but Russia would likely
become a player at this point in the crisis, as well. France and Germany, long
having been tied in with Russia for trade reasons, would create a
Paris-Moscow-Berlin Axis, and a New European Era would begin. Norman Davies,
author of the book Europe: A History divided European history into 4 eras:
Europe
I: Ancient Europe
Europe
II: Medieval Europe
Europe
III: Imperial Europe
Europe
IV: European Union
This
Axis would herald the arrival of Europe V, the New Enlightenment Europe, which
would consist of purely scientific, atheist, secular and more authoritarian
nations working to make Europe a revitalized, global force again, much like
during the late 19th century and early 20th. This great revolution, however,
would almost certainly begin with WWIII. With the assumed New Enlightenment
victory, the European Atheist Powers would become the masters of Europe and
challenge the U.S. and China for global hegemony. The Europeans would have the
best years of their lives to look forward to, with grand parties in France and
Germany to celebrate their ultimate victory over the rest of Europe, Russia
would be returned to its imperial glory, and Atheist Europa Rex would reclaim
its rightful place on the planet: in the top three global forces, alongside
China and America. If this were to occur in the far future, if one man was
smart enough to hack, say, an orbital defense grid to point the guns, missiles,
lasers or rail guns at Earth, he could potentially hold the world hostage as a
global governor, a “Supreme Dictator,” and do whatever he wanted to anyone and
anything. This is not likely within our lifetimes, but it is possible in the
future. One of the critical aspects of any New Enlightenment success would be
to take the U.S.A. out of the picture. There are three ways, I predict; that
this collapse could happen. One of the most likely ways is that the U.S. simply
can’t maintain its empire anymore, and implodes like the Soviet Union; as
predicted in 2009 by a Russian professor named Igor Panarin. He predicts that the
U.S. will eventually split into 6 nations. Atlantic America will likely become
part of Europe and therefore the New Enlightenment governments, if any exist at
the time of collapse, the Central North American Republic, which will go to
Canada, the Texas Republic, which will go to Mexico, the California Republic
becoming part of China; Hawaii will be annexed by Japan, and Alaska will go to
Russia. With the collapse of the United States, China, Russia and New
Enlightenment Europe would assume the role of global moderators, essentially
dealing a death blow to the slow, ineffective policies of democracy and
free-market capitalism. I’d like to see what the revitalized Russian Federation
would do to Sarah Palin, that’s for sure. This collapse would be a boon to Canada
and Mexico, with China becoming a colonial power in North America, spreading
its communist government to the Western states, headquartered in California. We
will be seeing “JOIN THE COMMUNIST PARTY! CHINESE SOLDIERS ARE FRIENDS!!!”
posters all over Los Angeles, and Hollywood movies would be a thing of the
past. In New York, the New Enlightenment rulers would utterly annihilate the
Jews, Christians and Muslims in both upstate NY and New York City. Thus, the
collapse of American power would be a huge boon for the rest of the developed
world, and create a more lasting peace in the long run.
The
second way that America could collapse is in fire and steel, with a Civil War
II. This would be even more devastating than an implosion. Families would be shattered,
best friends would be killing each other, and the U.S. would be ravaged by war
and foreign intervention. This war may begin by the way of an extreme divide in
conservative and liberal politics within America, which grows so polarized that
it breaks into open conflict between liberals and conservatives, the U.S.
splits along these lines, and whoever wins the war would take control as a
one-party ruler, effectively ending democracy in America and ushering in a new
era of tax-code reform and drastic social, political and legal system changes,
based on the political orientation of the ruling powers that be. Either way,
the Republic would become an Empire through civil war, much like the Roman
Empire did.
The
third way is the most ideal for New Enlightenment purposes. The U.S. fights a
war with the New Enlightenment powers directly and loses, and the New
Enlightenment powers dictate conditions, most of them absolutely crippling,
much like the sanctions on Germany after WWI, completely removing the American
empire from the world stage, but this could easily backfire and trigger a
violent, Fascist “Fourth Reich” in the U.S., in which the U.S. rebuilds and
attacks in a vengeful storm of wrath; the rise of the Fascist America will
parallel that of the Nazi Party in Germany, with the rebuilding of a vast
American military, on the scale of what was done in WWII, and the social scene
would rebound in a splendor never before seen, with lavish parties, huge, new
houses and a nearly nonexistent unemployment rate, everyone would have a job,
the tax code would be reformed, and America would become an unfathomably
powerful colossus again. The most critical part of this Fascist America would
be its military superiority. Millions would flock to the New America to see its
power and wonders, much like they did in Germany before the war broke out in
1939. If any New Enlightenment governments existed in Europe at the time of
these events, the Fascist America would ally itself with them, creating a joint
Europa Rex-Fascist America alliance, along with Russia being involved, and
would pave the way for an entire Western Imperium, consisting of Europe,
Anglo-America, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Russia, Argentina, and
other predominantly white nations; this global New Enlightenment hyperpower
would become the strongest and greatest Empire in history, and would be the
ultimate incarnation of the New Enlightenment and Atheist Supremacy. At the
heart of this Empire would be the Brotherhood, who would become the equivalent
of the SS in Nazi Germany. The Hooded Knights of the New Enlightenment would
enforce the Imperium’s laws and be responsible for purging the undesirables,
such as Jews, Christians, blacks, Muslims, and anyone who opposes the New
Enlightenment and Atheist Supremacy. The Imperium would teach the 4 Pillars of
the Brotherhood and become the global policeman, intervening anywhere where
atheism is threatened or the Imperium disagrees with their policies in any way
at all. At the heart of this Imperium would be belief in science, namely
Darwinism and evolution. Darwin’s theory, the only logical way to explain the
diversity of life on Earth, states that all life is locked in a constant
struggle to survive, and that those with favorable traits are more likely to
survive than others that do not. If this is the natural way of things, than who
are we as humans to deny it in society? For example, a black slave is naturally
inferior to his white master simply for being a slave; his inferiority is shown
by his lack of freedom, and vice-versa. The Imperium would have a distinct
Linnaean caste system, based off of Linnaeus’ classification system. Atop the
pyramid would be politicians, scientists and soldiers; at the bottom would be
slaves, unnecessary forms of humanity and criminals. Each caste is based off of
its importance to New Enlightenment society, and soldiers are at the heart of
the matter. You cannot have a supreme Empire without a supreme military. A
Fascist, New Enlightenment-allied U.S. would have laws similar to the Nuremburg
Laws, which would strip minorities of every single right; they couldn’t own
businesses, go to college, had to attend segregated “Jew schools,” where they
were taught how inferior they were and how to be subservient to the White Race,
monitored, government-issued housing from which they would not be allowed to
leave under any circumstances, under the penalty of being shot on sight by
Brotherhood guards; in other words, the undesirables would be relegated to
“creature” status, on the same level as a dog or some other animal. According
to Ernst Zundel, the Jews brought the Holocaust upon themselves; by turning
against Germany, the most powerful, well-educated and well-armed nation in
Europe, Hitler only did what he needed to do to keep his Empire from caving in
on itself from Jewish subversion. Zundel
now warns that the Jewish Nation is attempting to do the same thing to America;
he blames people like the spoiled “Jewish princess” types for hogging the
wealth, power and success away from good, hardworking Americans, and that
they’re “asking for it” by simply existing. “Democracy is growing weaker every
day. Soon, we will have another leader like Hitler.” That kind of government
may very well arise in America. This idea of “racism” and “anti-Semitism” towards
people who disagree with the Jews and other minorities is sickening and far
more hateful than anything a Nazi or skinhead would say. This is the result of
the liberalized, democratic war machine against the White Race practiced by the
European Union and the United States; the governments protect the inferior
beings with Jewish and socialist fabrications of “Holocausts” and
“anti-Fascism.” Since when is it racist to tell the truth?! To sum it up,
Hitler didn’t do enough!!! When the New Enlightenment and Atheist Supremacy
rise, it’s high time we finish the job! There will be a great cry in all of
Europe and America like which the world has never seen before or ever will see
again!! HAIL TO EUROPA, THE CLEANSER OF SINS, HAIL TO AMERICA, SHE ALWAYS
WINS!!!!”
How,
do you ask, would this society arise? The Nazis, the Japanese, the Mongols,
Timur-i-Lan’s Empire, the Romans, the Ottomans and the Soviets, all built
colossal Empires that were supposed to last forever, but all fell, died and
were cast to the wastebasket of history. It seems rather illogical. Why would
an empire as long-lasting a Rome or as colossal as the USSR and the Mongols
simply fail and fall to pieces? The truth is that no matter how powerful a
state becomes, change, internal stresses and external threats, not to mention
the basic aspects of maintaining a civilization, take their toll, until the
Empire can no longer support itself. For the Nazi Empire it was the external
stress of war and the tactical errors made by its leaders that let other societies
eventually destroy it. However, these empires, as powerful as they were, were
not the biggest entity on the world stage. According to Samuel P. Huntington,
he divided Earth into not nations, but civilizations; of which Huntington named
9, the Western Civilization, consisting of the USA and Europe, the Latin
Civilization, consisting of Mexico, Central and South American countries, the
Japanese Civilization being confined to Japan, the Sinic Civilization,
consisting of most of Eastern China and Korea, the Buddhist Civilization
consisting of Mongolia, Southeast Asia and Western China, Hindu Civilization in
India and Sri Lanka, the huge Islamic Civilization, a broad swath from North
Africa to Indonesia, the Orthodox Civilization, consisting of most of the
former USSR states, with a conflict fault line with the Muslim civilization in
Central Asia, and the African Civilization, Africa, south of the Sahara. Each
of these societies consists of many nations who share a common ethnic
background and a similar practice of languages and cultures, although within a
civilization’s individual members there can be vast political differences and
even wars, one can easily argue that the reason for the Western Civilization’s
near-mystic power was born out of war, it was war that brought the European
Union together, through WWII, and gave the U.S. its ability to project its
power anywhere, therefore bringing the West to the forefront of global affairs.
In 2012, as of this writing, these 9 civilizations appear to be in no danger of
imminent collapse. Even if one country collapsed, say, in Europe, the
civilization would survive. What, then, would it take for a whole civilization
to collapse, and has this happened before? Absolutely. As a matter of fact, it
is an alarming trend in history, how quickly societies can collapse. Look at
the Roman Empire. This was not just a nation; it was, in itself, a
civilization. For 300 years, the known world WAS Rome. The Roman Empire ruled,
at its peak in 117 A.D., 1/3 of the world’s population. Eventually, however,
the Roman Empire ran into the old enemy of Empires everywhere: over-expansion.
The empire became so large that it couldn’t be administered effectively with
just one ruler, so it was divided into eastern and western halves, with the Western
Empire being ruled from Rome and the Eastern Empire under Byzantium. In 476
A.D., the last Western Emperor, Romulus Augustus, was forced to abdicate to the
German warlord Odoacer. Even though the Eastern Empire survived until 1453
A.D., reaching its full glory by 550 A.D., the Roman Empire was never a
civilization ever again. The civilization died with the Empire. Since the fall
of the Roman Empire, no one has managed to rule over all of Europe in the same
way that the Roman Caesars did, though many have tried; the Habsburgs, Stalin,
Napoleon, and Hitler all failed. Look at the Mesoamerican civilizations of the
Aztec, Inca and Maya. They were attacked and destroyed by other civilizations,
causing their collapse via military invasion in the case of the Aztecs and
Incas, and possibly environmental catastrophe in the case of the First Mayan
Empire. However, these civilizations were ancient, primitive compared to the
globalized society we have today. With entities such as the European Union and
the proposed Mediterranean Union, however compromised financially, and the
global economy’s average standards of living skyrocketing, it may seem that our
civilization, the global civilization, is immune to collapse. That is not the
case. As a matter of fact, our society may be literally on the brink of total
breakdown. According to Jared Diamond, author of “Collapse, How Societies
Choose to Fail or Succeed,” most civilizations enter a sharp peak, then just as
sharp a decline, roughly about 20 years after they reach the peak of power and
wealth. Think the year 2000, when the West’s economy seemed completely
invincible and all the other rising powers were doing very well too. Just 12
years later, however, our society seems to be heading for a catastrophic
meltdown. The European Union’s Euro crisis has become so pronounced that Greece
as a sovereign nation may cease to exist, destroying living standards and
leaving Greece bankrupt and unable to pay even the most basic of its expenses.
Such a collapse would spread to the other beleaguered European nations, such as
Italy, Portugal, Ireland and Spain, possibly triggering a full run on the
European banks in a total financial apocalypse. The worst-case scenario is
this: A chain of debt defaults destroys the European banking system, causing
multiple countries to withdraw from the Eurozone and possibly the European
Union itself, leading to hyper-polarity and catastrophic inflation in places
like Germany and France as they try to offset the economic pain by simply
printing money. The value of the Euro would plummet until it was completely
worthless, and political polarization could lead to resurgence in authoritarian
governments, even Fascism, in places like Austria and Germany, countries with
notorious histories of authoritarianism, Fascism is alive and well, and in
Austria, an extreme-right politician named Werner Faymann of the Social
Democratic Party was elected Chancellor in 2009, and has openly condoned
expulsion of various minorities from Austrian society, such as Jews and homosexuals.
Furthermore, he uses the Burschenshaft, an Order of Austrian Knights, as a
police force. Austria is currently one of the richest countries in the world,
with a per capita income of $48,350 in 2011. However, a full run of European
banks would quickly change that, as well as cripple Germany and render European
borders in the East almost meaningless. Europe would face total collapse and
anarchy. This would reverberate across the globe, from Beijing to Boise. The
U.S. would be plunged into another recession. China would face economic
implosion, as would India. Russia would probably assimilate the Eastern
European nations again, as well as the former Soviet states, and build a new
Russian Empire. If the U.S. couldn’t solve its debt problems, it would go
bankrupt and fall like the USSR, with Canada and Mexico taking a good chunk of
the Lower 48 States, with the East and West Coasts joining the E.U. and falling
under Chinese control, respectively, with Hawaii going to Japan or China, and
Alaska becoming part of Russia again, with Russia expanding its influence into
Canada for oil production and resource tapping. Russia’s standard of living
would, according to Igor Panarin, a Russian professor and a former KGB analyst,
raise twenty-fold, making Russia a true superpower again, and make Russia and
China, assuming China survives; the global forces for the greater good. Armed
conflict would define human existence by 2020, according to a paper published
by the Pentagon in 2003, with a combination of political, environmental and
economic plagues…exactly 20 years after the promise of 2000, and a new world
would rise from the ashes, one dominated by authoritarian Russian and Chinese
superpowers, dominating Europe, Asia and North America. Does this have your
attention? If this happens, it would fulfill exactly what Jared Diamond has
pointed out. No society, however large, is too big to fail. However, Diamond
has pointed out that most societies go through a “12-step collapse equation,”
which culminates in a catastrophic meltdown, destroying the society completely.
If this happens, it will be the biggest collapse of human society in history by
far. The basic, underlying cause of this collapse would, ironically, be the
very thing that built the society in the first place: capitalism and the free
market. Adam Smith, in his work, “The Wealth of Nations,” published in March of
1776, just 4 months until the Declaration of Independence was signed in
America, claimed that free-market capitalism, where the government doesn’t interfere
with the private sector and growth is driven by supply and demand, is far more
beneficial to societies than the old system of government-operated
mercantilism, because it allows people to be their own masters, not slaves to a
boss or government’s will. Smith advocated the advent of the small business,
rather than a guild and journeyman, where anyone, from the poorest pauper to
the richest trader, could open a business, sell a product and make money, with
no government approval. The new United States of America, upon its
independence, adopted Smith’s policies as its basic blueprint for an economy
that still operates along the same principles…and now does the rest of the
world. America’s power has changed the world in more ways than any other
society since Ancient Rome, but it is this colossal “global free market,”
estimated by Goldman-Sachs to be worth more than $550 trillion by 2050, that is
burying us alive. With the rise of mega-cities, cities that contain more than
10 million people, we face real danger of collapse within the next century. In
1970, there were 3 mega-cities, New York, Tokyo and Mexico City. By 2070, there
will be nearly 100. Even cities like Kinshasa, in the heart of Africa, will be
globalized and enormous. Also, by 2070, there will be more than 50 economies
that total $1 trillion or more in nominal GDP. The planet simply can’t sustain
50 trillion-dollar economies. The society is just too big. The Roman Empire
faced this problem in the 4th century C.E., so it was divided into eastern and
western halves, which essentially sealed the Empire’s fate. This global society
of capitalism, trade and prosperity can only last so long; it is almost
indistinguishable from the problems facing Rome during the final century of its
existence. Civilization is too large, too powerful and too wasteful to survive
in its current state. Unless our society goes through profound internal reform,
it cannot survive in its current state or trajectory without a colossal
catastrophe. I don’t know when this day is, but one day our descendants will
look back at us and ask: “Why didn’t they do something?” Who are “they,” you
ask? If you live in Western Europe, Canada or America, you only have to look in
a mirror. The Western Civilization, the first-world society described by Samuel
P. Huntington as the “leader of humanity,” is leading human society down a
suicidal path. The West consumes more than 40% of Earth’s resources, and by
2030, just the West alone will be consuming three planets’ worth of energy per
annum. If this continues, the planet will fly into chaos. Another Pentagon
report in 2007 stated that by 2100, because of pollution, climate change and
overpopulation, China will be inundated by rising sea levels, flooding 70% of
the world’s coastlines, droughts and water shortages will trigger mass famine
in Africa, India and Bangladesh, the U.S. will be forced to close its borders
to millions of desperate refugees, the risk of armed conflict will rise to
certainty, and the only countries that will be in any shape to stop the
catastrophic collapse of civilization will be the NORCs, the U.S., Canada,
Russia, and the Scandinavian countries, with access to water, resources and
other assets needed for society. Even though we can’t see it yet, the situation
is already dire. The sad reality is that the Western Civilization,
globalization and capitalism are destroying society. Jared Diamond proposed
that societies display 12 “warning signs” of imminent collapse hazards. Our
society is experiencing every single one of these issues now, and things are
only going to get worse…I do not agree with Diamond in the fact that all
society is facing the same problems. I believe that the West, given its level
of development and primacy, has the most to lose, and the rival powers in the
East have the most to gain. If the West is to maintain its preeminence, it must
drastically reform its political means, and the first way to put Europe and
America back on track to supreme power and push them closer to the New
Enlightenment ideology would be to drastically reform the education systems to
be completely religion-free, even parochial, Christian schools, Jewish schools
and Muslim schools would be banned and disbanded, forcing the students to
accept the way of progress and upward mobility. For example, the ACE curriculum
mentioned in my opening chapter does nothing but teach schoolchildren nothing
short of religious propaganda, and teaches a far greater evil than anything I’m
writing here. Just look at the data. According to the National Center for Education
Statistics, the long-term trends in math, science and the Combined Literacy and
Academic Scale show a decline in the U.S.’ education quality and quantity when
compared to the rest of the world. The reason the quality of the material they
are learning is deteriorating. For example, just look at Bobby Jindal’s plan to
“reform” education in Louisiana with state taxpayer money by giving kids
vouchers to attend these ultra-religious private schools; taxpayer money that
comes from plenty of self-respecting atheists, Darwinists and scientists. This
is a crime against academia, not to mention an extremely poor method of
boosting graduation rates. The Accelerated Christian Education (ACE) curriculum
is a meaningless propaganda tool made solely for the purpose of brainwashing
children and fooling parents into thinking that their children are on a path to
godliness. Not only is it distasteful, racist and wrong on so many levels, it
doesn’t encourage learning, as defined as practicing skills obtained and
retained in a constructive manner. The ACE curriculum emphasizes solely on
memorization of facts, and the questions on ACE tests contain meaningless
multiple-choice questions that require no critical thought, such as “Jesus died
on the (cross, toss, chrome.)” Another ACE flaw is the material itself. It only
teaches religion. This is doing a great disservice to American schoolchildren;
this is the 21st century, not the 12th. For example, it teaches no practical
science, and is strictly one-sided in all controversial issues; instead of
allowing students to look at an issue from both sides, they are spoon-fed
propaganda, such as “a necessary war with Iran to stop the Muslim corruption of
moral values” This cannot be allowed. As an anti-theist and a pro-active
atheist opposing any form of religious harm, the U.S.A. believes that Iran is
the threat, but no, the problem is that damn Jewish state of Israel. The
President has shown immense restraint to Israeli pressure, even ignoring their
ranting about attacking Iran before they obtain nuclear weapons. Iran is not
the problem, Israel is. Zionism, or the belief that Jews must have their own
country, is a scourge on this Earth and only brings animosity between Israelis
and Arabs. The U.S., being the religious hellhole that it is, has become
Israel’s subservient, as has the rest of the Western world. This is a disgrace
to atheism and rational thought. Israel, when looked at objectively, is a white
supremacist, racist, murderous, criminal state, just as bad as the Nazis. Ask
why and you get fed some drivel about what Moses did or did not say. The
evidence for this persecution of non-Jewish inhabitants of the so-called “Holy
Land” is overwhelming. Israel is deporting a first planeload of African
migrants back to their home country. Israel says the deportation of 120
Africans to South Sudan is the first step toward expelling thousands more. More
than 4,000 migrants who came from African countries that have friendly ties
with Israel will be sent home on weekly flights. Describing the migrants as
"infiltrators," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel is
carrying out the deportation in a humane way while safeguarding their dignity.
Each deportee was given 1,000 euros to help them start a new life in South
Sudan. But for the migrants, deportation is a punishment. Many have been in
Israel for years, having fled war or poverty for the relative prosperity of the
Jewish state. Simon Meir, who describes himself a Sudanese refugee, says he and
the others want asylum in Israel. "We are asking peacefully that refugees
from Sudan should be recognized as refugees here, to take their rights, to give
them health care, education and, you know, all these things," he said.
We're being occupied by Israelis. We love our Israeli atheists, we don't like the
right wing extreme racist government of Israel, and it’s nothing personal
towards Israelis. Our governments only wish we would endorse and big up their
crimes as you do yours. Israel is always the problem. The sooner the USA stops
bowing to AIPAC American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the better for the
whole world it will be. Less and less Orthodox American Jews feel any affinity
with Israel. In that case, protecting the racist, right-wing Israeli political
vermin is counterproductive to the New Enlightenment. We should simply let
Israel go to its own devices. If Israel wants a war with Iran, leave them to
it. Do not drag the Western and Israeli atheists and secularists into a war
solely for the purpose of expanding Jewish Zionism into the Islamic world. That
is inexcusable. All three Abrahamic religions are manifestations of hate; the
Christians are guilty of the Inquisition, which killed more Jews than Nazism or
communism COMBINED, Muslims are guilty of the 9-11-01 attacks and Jews are
guilty of Zionist brainwashing and imperialism in the Middle East. The bottom
line is that the problem is not any one particular religion, but religion
itself. The Brotherhood and the New Enlightenment will see to it that the
crimes of religion are punished, and that a New Era of peace, prosperity and
progress begins.
2. The Religious Conspiracy and the Bastardization of Truth
The
Age of Absolutism: Commonly associated with imperial splendor and pride, the
Empires of Europe reached epic size and power. Louis XIV of France, King James
II of England, Charles III of Spain, Francis II of Austria, Peter the Great of
Russia and King Fredrick II of Prussia all ruled over vast empires, with
colonies all over the world, and their authority was truly absolute. Louis XIV
practiced “rule by splendor,” self-sufficiency and lived by the sword,
expanding French territory to the Rhine River, and conquering all of Canada and
the Louisiana Territory, parts of India, Madagascar and various ports in Africa
and the Caribbean. Spain, notorious for its brutality, ruled over an immense
Empire as well, and it showed no mercy to heretics or dissenters, with God’s
Jury, the Inquisition, persecuting nonbelievers and blasphemers with the threat
of torture. James II was also a Catholic monarch; the Catholic Spain, France
and England, were it not for the Glorious Revolution in 1688, would have formed
a mighty alliance to crush the Protestant Dutch Republic. This never
materialized, and King William III of Orange became ruler of an Anglo-Dutch
superpower in 1688. Russia, however, was on a surreal level when it came to
monarchism. Peter the Great, the builder of the vast Russian Empire was even
more totalitarian than Louis XIV was. The peasantry became the Czar’s personal
property; Peter I had essentially enslaved his entire country, brutally killed
anyone who opposed his reign, this included his own son and his wife, and
suffered from paranoid schizophrenia. He made Russia a massive, global power,
however, building a Navy on par with that of the Dutch or English Royal Navy,
and had the largest Army on Earth, and his dynasty, the Romanovs, would rule
unopposed until 1917. The one thing that all of these Empires shared in common,
however, was that religion was a major driving force behind their tyranny. The
truth, however, is that religion is not real, but world governments use it as a
tool to keep their citizens in line. The government tells us that it’s real,
even though they know that it isn’t, because the fear of damnation is so great
that it inspires loyalty to the State and its ideology. The only “absolute
truth” is that there isn’t one. Religion, especially the Judeo-Christian
religion, is just a 7000-year old scam, a conspiracy founded by ancient
governments and propagated by successive governments as a governing tool. It is
truly the greatest story ever SOLD. In
the film “Zeitgeist: The Movie,” the first episode discusses that Christianity
is not a “God-given story,” but a mishmash of eastern religious ideas, combined
with metaphysical representations of good and evil. The other Abrahamic
religions are exactly the same. How else could each religion’s holy text
possibly share so many characters and lessons unless they copied off of each
other? Another topic discussed was the “Jesus myth,” in which Jesus was not
even a real person, just a figurehead, similar to the way Uncle Sam is for the
United States. In fact, Israeli archaeologists have actually figured out who
wrote the Bible’s Old Testament: the Minoans and the Egyptians. These two
Empires were the most advanced societies of their day, and probably wrote the
Old Testament by filling it with Hebrew lore and legend, people that the
Minoans and Egyptians were very familiar with. Once the Old Testament was
finished, around that same time, the Minoan civilization collapsed and the
Egyptian Empire was conquered by the Hittites. Thus, the New Testament was written
by Roman scholars studying the ancient Greek and Egyptian texts and
collections. And there, you have it, the whole Bible, from Genesis to
Revelations. The book, however, is so old that its truth or falsehood became
distorted by time. Even in 17th-century England, the seeds of religious decline were being sown, as a chronicler named Peter Mundy, upon examining the ranges of several now-extinct insular organisms questioned the Genesis story of creation, more than 2 centuries before Darwin. Today, Western Europe is a hotbed for atheism, Germany, France, The Netherlands and Britain are more than 60% atheist or agnostic, and Britain has been described as a "post-Christian" scientific state, as has Germany, France, and The Netherlands. In fact, more than 40% of the European Union is far more secular than anywhere else on Earth. If you count Iceland, a potential E.U. candidate, and Switzerland, not a member of the E.U., that number jumps to 42%
